Archive for category Consumer Electronics

Nikon D5000 recalled so got a Canon EOS 500D (T1i), a quick comparison

About 3 weeks ago I bought a Nikon D5000 as my first DSLR and I was thrilled with the pictures it took. Not only was it extremely easy to use for a total photography newb but it also made me look like a much better photographer than I was. Can’t complain about that.

All was well until a little while ago when Nikon published that they had found a fatal flaw in the circuitry of the D5000 and would need to recall them to fix them. While they made this extremely easy via website and paying for shipping, something just didn’t sit right with me. Paying over $700+ for a camera that was essentially going to be torn apart and fixed felt to me like I was paying $700 for a refurb. Also it concerned me that this may be the first of many other problems they could discover over time.

So I went back to BestBuy and managed to return the camera for a full refund. It wasn’t an ejoyable experience but that’s a story for another day and time. I then decided to switch sides and went with the Canon EOS 500D (T1i) which some say is Canon’s competitor to the Nikon D5000 while others say it’s the competitor to the Nikon D90. Either way, it’s a really nice camera.

  • The Canon feels about the same as the D5000 in that they both feel solid and of good quality but the Canon is slightly smaller and lighter.
  • The screen on the Canon blows away the Nikon since the Canon has a 640×480 resolution while the Nikon has a 320×240. This really helps when you review pictures you just took as well as on the random occasion you decide to use Live View.
  • The Canon also boots up faster from a cold start to the point where it’s ready to take pics which is always handy.
  • The Canon has a higher ISO range than the D5000 which is useful for taking pictures without the flash. I’m not even qualified to call myself a novice photographer but man I hate using the flash. It totally washes out the colors and tones of a picture that are so beautiful when captured in natural light. The Canon’s higher ISO gives you the ability to push the limit of what you can do without a flash.
  • The Canon is much noisier when focusing since the kit lens it comes with doesn’t have any type of noise reduction. The Nikon is extremely quiet and I miss that.
  • The Canon’s menu’s and options are more designed for the more mature photographer or enthusiast while the Nikon is definitely setup for people like me who are generally clueless. An example is that the Nikon D5000 allows LiveView shooting in any mode including all full auto modes. The Canon? You can only use LiveView in semi-auto modes which is a pain especially when you may want to have random friends/family to take pictures of you with it.
  • The pictures seem to be similar in quality but the Canon seems to do a better job of having colors that really pop in the pictures. The Nikon’s pictures on the other hand are beautiful but the colors seem softer to me personally.
  • The Canon in LiveView uses a separate button to lock focus and then you press the shutter button to capture the picture. The D5000 uses a slower autofocus method in LiveView but you use the shutter to focus just like you would expect. I miss this on the Canon.
  • The D5000 has many more scene modes and other presets than the Canon. The Canon has the standard Auto, Creative Auto (not particularly useful) and basic settings like Night, Macro, Sports, etc. The Nikon has a ton more including a setting for Pet Shots among others
  • The Canon has 9-point focus while the Nikon has 11-point. In most cases this doesn’t seem to hamper me too much but I do get the sense that the Nikon did a better job with autofocus than the Canon.
  • The Canon has support for 1080p/20fps video while the Nikon doesn’t. I doubt I would ever use it at this level and most likely will stick with 720p/30fps which is supported on the Nikon as well.

All in all the cameras are fairly evenly matched from my perspective and you can’t go wrong with either one – although I’m sure hardcore photographers may have good reason to pick one over the other.

Here are some pictures taken with each camera that I feel are some of the better shots I was able to get with them to serve as samples. Click on the images for the originals on Flickr.

Nikon D5000:
DSC_0005
DSC_0001
DSC_0001

Canon EOS 500D (T1i):
IMG_0021
IMG_0168
IMG_0210

Tags: , , , , , ,

Yes, I got an iPhone…the irony doesn’t escape me

iPhoneAfter writing a rather scathing post on the iPhone and posting quite a few negative things about it, I decided to put my money where my mouth is and give it a shot. It turned out that the AT&T store near me had quite a few in stock and not a ridiculous amount of people waiting for one so I got one on Friday, June 29th at 6:05pm!

The reason I decided to even give it a shot is I came to the realization that the only features I consistently use on any of my cellphones are the music, video, web browsing, email and chat. I’ve had many phones that can do a lot more than that but beyond the initial period where it’s fun to play with I’ve never used more than these five main things.

I’ll be posting my iPhone review in the next few days but having used it over the weekend some of the things I expected to be not so great about it are true and some things have impressed me.

It is by far the best iPod and perhaps the best media player out there. The 3.5 widescreen lends itself immensely to watch videos, movies, tv shows,etc. It’s also nice to be able to see full screen Album art of music, podcasts, etc. The controls are great, the sound and video are superb so the iPod part of the iPhone truly lives up to the hype.

The web browsing part is perhaps the second most stunning thing about the iPhone – especially when using Wifi as opposed to EDGE (Cingular’s network). It renders web pages exactly as they would on your PC/Mac. There are no limitations except no Flash (which they may or may not add later). This is very refreshing since you can for the first time do all the things you can on your laptop/PC on a mobile device including paying your bills, shopping, searching for stuff,etc. The dedicated Google maps app also adds a lot to the device in practicality.

The email part is so-so, especially for me being such an avid Blackberry user. It does work as advertised but isn’t the most fully functioned and typing long emails on the touch-screen keyboard is nowhere near as nice as using a dedicated keyboard. But the biggest upside is that HTML emails are rendered perfectly as if you were using Outlook or a desktop client. This is a huge improvement and something that no Blackberry or Windows Mobile device supports at this level.

Chat is perhaps the biggest letdown on the iPhone because they currently don’t have one on the device. There’s a lot of speculation that it will be added soon as a software update but I’ll believe it when I see it. Currently only chat-like functionality is using SMS which costs money, which in turn sucks.

The phone part of it is great but a step backwards from current phones out there. There’s no voice dialing (which I use a lot), there’s no speed dial because there’s no buttons – instead there’s a list of favorites, there’s no MMS (which I never used) and some other basic things.

The fact that it runs on EDGE is also a letdown since it’s much slower than other 3G networks like Verizon or Sprint have. But it’s designed to switch between EDGE and Wifi pretty seamlessly so anywhere you have a WiFi connection you’re going to be surfing along fine. In the end it’s a safe bet that also due to a recent issue with Qualcomm 3G chips not being allowed into the US, 3G cellphones may experience delays in being released in the US at least.

In the end, and I’ll save more for the review, the iPhone has to be thought of as an absolutely stunning iPod with fantastic web browsing, excellent email and decent phone functionality. Also the user interface is a pleasure to use and makes you wish all things could be this easy to operate.

 I still haven’t decided whether to keep it or return/sell it but so far so good.

11 iPhone Gotchas (Drawbacks)

Want an iPhone? Of course you do. It looks sexy, it’s innovative, and–for a while at least–it’ll be the ultimate status symbol. But in the fog of iPhone hype, it’s easy to lose sight of the fact that the latest Apple sensation will still have its share of disadvantages.

read more | digg story

All-in-one iPhone looks nifty, but should you put it on hold?

The iPhone’s battleground is outside the home, where for nearly a decade, digital alchemists have searched for the ultimate hand-held gizmo: a true all-in-one device that will not only make phone calls, play music, e-mail, manage an appointment calendar and take pictures but also surf the Web. This type of device has been done many times but never well.

read more | digg story

Blackberry 8830 launches on Verizon Wireless

One of the best Blackberry devices that gives you both CDMA/EVDO (Verizon’s network in US) and GSM/GPRS roaming when abroad (basically what the rest of the world uses) has launched on Verizon Wireless. If you’re on Verizon Wireless and have been waiting to jump on the ‘berry bandwagon then this is the one you’ve been waiting for. Apart from the global roaming capabilities, it has the latest BB 4.2 OS, an amazing screen, sleek and lightweight form factor as well as the new trackball nav.

Go get it while it’s hot

5 Problems With the Upcoming Apple iPhone

iPhoneOk, lets get it out of the way. This is only my personal opinion and should only be taken as such especially by the Apple faithful.

So where to start? Well as everyone probably knows a while back now Apple commander-in-chief Steve Jobs announced the iPhone and the Apple world collectively starting weeping with joy. Mind you a lot of folks who aren’t real hardcore Apple users were also mesmerized by the shiny device that Steve demonstrated on the stage. I think for maybe the duration of keynote most people were probably slowly reaching into their back pockets for their wallet ready to plop down whatever money Apple was asking for….but then we were all told the dirty specs and pricing behind the iPhone which really, for me personally, made it a non starter.

Let me elaborate:

  1. The iPhone runs on EDGE which is Cingular’s/AT&T’s 2-3 year old data network that maxes out at theoretical speeds of 75-135kbp which really isn’t saying much. To translate that into common terms we’re talking about a maximum speed of approximately twice the speed of dial-up (remember that? some of you may be too young!) but on average as fast (or as slow) as dial-up. Now this wouldn’t be a big deal except well, our friend  Steve-o decided that he wanted to put a full fledged OS on the device with a swanky Safari web browser, Google maps and more. If you don’t know where I’m going by now, you may never get it but I’ll say it for your sake: EDGE is too slow for the iPhone. You will have time to run home and browse a website on your PC while you wait for your faithful iPhone to load a website. Other mobiles work around this by using proxies to compress content such as the excellent Opera Mini browser but no, Apple wants you to browse the wonderful world wide web with all its annoying ads and flash based content at a speed that they themselves couldn’t honestly say was sufficient with a straight face.
  2. Touch screen isn’t new and is horrible for typing. No I haven’t used an iPhone but guess what, the whole touch screen thing has been done for years with Palm and Windows Mobile devices. The fact is manufacturers stayed away from them because it just is not the best interface for typing more than 2-3 words. Although Steve made fun of Treos and Blackberry devices in his keynote, was he also calling the millions of users out there who use them and love them idiots? Reality is that using a touch screen for typing is just not as easy as with a dedicated keyboard. If you want to illustrate this to yourself (assuming you’re somewhat proficient in typing) go ahead and type something on your computer’s keyboard….see nice and easy right? Now find a flat surface, preferably a coffee or dining table and pretend there’s a keyboard on it (you can even cut out a piece of paper that looks like a keyboard if you want) and try using it as a keyboard. Notice something? Even there were “touch screen” keys there it doesn’t feel right. It’s because we rely a lot on the tactile feel of buttons, this lets our brains know that we’ve succesfully pressed the button and also allows us to learn typing without looking thanks to muscle memory.  Add to that the fact everytime you need to input something the keyboard has to take over the whole screen of the iPhone so you can tap on it which really takes away from the user experience. So in summary, good luck typing more than a few words on your iPhone  using the touch screen keyboard without having to constantly stare at it and watch every button you press.
  3. Corporate integration is non-existent. This may not matter to most users but it seems Apple is comparing their iPhone to the likes of Blackberry and Windows Mobile. Both of these platforms are if nothing very capable when it comes to corporate integration. Both work flawlessly with Microsoft Exchange syncing not just email but your calendar, address book, notes, tasks and more. Apple’s offering? Yahoo IMAP email! Because I’m sure hundreds of thousands of people were jump ship and start using Yahoo IMAP email for their business purposes. Also although Apple calls their Yahoo IMAP email “push email” it’s not even close to it. The IMAP protocol is inherently push because all email is stored on the server so your email client stays connected to the email server, this both eats data and battery life since your iPhone has to keep a constant connection with Yahoo’s email server. Windows Mobile has a slightly more elegant method and of course Blackberry has the best push email method which truly “pushes” the email to your device which is one of the reasons Blackberry battery life is so good.
  4. No removable battery. So I guess Apple feels that since you can’t remove the battery from your iPod why should you from the iPhone? Problem is that the iPhone is meant to be both your MP3/video player as well as your cell phone. My 5G iPod itself doesn’t have such stellar battery life and that’s with a tiny screen with mild usage. Now think of the iPhone’s massive screen, super thin form factor (where the battery is) the multiple radios onboard (Bluetooth, GSM/GPRS, WiFi) and I wouldn’t be shocked if the battery life in certain conditions would fall under an hour. Of course people will argue that this is the price that is paid for such an “amazing” device but alas when your battery dies on you unexpectedly, and trust me that it will at some point, you will be forced to pull out your charger in the middle of nowhere and hunt for a outlet. Meanwhile, those “dumbphones” as Steve Jobs likes to call the competition can easily slip out one battery and slip in another ready to go or even a higher performance battery if needed. To me this is one of the bigger glaring flaws with it and something that will come to bite Apple in their posterior as people start using the iPhone
  5. It’s hard putting the price of the iPhone down as a problem since it’s subjective. For some people $1,000 is chump change but I think more than the sticker price what is going to work against it is the 2-year contract supposedly required with the purchase. Anything can happen but as of now we’re looking at ~$599 for the 8GB iPhone with a 2-year agreement with Cingular/AT&T. So what does that mean? Apart from the usual monthly $39.99 or whatever voice plan you have you will also need to make sure you pay for the data which currently looks to be around $20 EXTRA a month. For those of you who do not currently have a phone that requires a data plan, this will be an additional cost you need to take into account…$20 * 24 months = $480 over two years alone just for data. They may still come out with a cheaper data plan but so far that looks to be it.

I could go on for quite some time on this but these to me are five of the main issues with the iPhone. I know a few people are annoyed that it’s not an open system that people apart from Apple can develop software for, although for its worth I think that’s the least of their problems.

Don’t get me wrong I’m not naive or ignorant, I know the hordes of loyal Apple fans will still run out to their local Cingular/AT&T or Apple stores in June to get their iPhones. All I will say is make sure you can return it in 30 days because I have a feeling some of you may end up doing so. Good luck.

Toshiba HD-DVD and Planet Earth (HD-DVD), what a great couple

HDDVD LogoSo I know it might sound stupid to jump on the proverbial HD-format bandwagon since there really hasn’t been a clear winner between HD DVD and Blu-Ray, I figured I might as well jump in. I went ahead and ordered a Toshiba HD-A2 HD DVD player from Amazon and of course the Planet Earth HD DVD set (original BBC series) to accompany it.

I got the HD-A2 pretty quickly and it was very easy to setup via HDMI to my Onkyo TXSR803 receiver. Sadly the Planet Earth HD DVD set was delayed and only shipped late last week. I’m anxiously waiting for it to arrive so I can truly test out the capabilities of the HD DVD format. However the few Netflix HD DVD rentals I’ve tried all came across pretty well, quality varied by film and I’m assuming the transfer of that film to HD.

But if you do the math, the Toshiba HD-A2 can be had on Amazon for around $320 plus you get 5 free HD DVD movies to mail away for. Then the Planet Earth HD DVD set usually $99.99 is for $69 which is a decent deal. So basically for ~$400 you get a competent HD DVD player, an amazing series and HD showpiece and five HD movies of your choice. Not a bad deal at all.

By the way, if you do end up getting a Toshiba HD DVD player (whichever model it is) keep in mind that firmware updates are your friends and these players only come with RJ-45 (ethernet jacks) so make sure you are setup to hook this bad boy into your home network to download firmware updates. I did that as soon as I got mine and the update I downloaded had some pretty major fixes such as “pixelation fix”…no joke.

All in all I’m liking the Toshiba HD-A2 a lot and as soon as I get my Planet Earth HD DVD set I’ll post my impression of that. If you’re thinking of taking a HD disc format for a spin this is not a bad way to go.

P.S. I have an Xbox 360 so the HD DVD accessory was a thought but I wanted Dolby TrueHD and other losless audio codecs which are only possible over HDMI which the Xbox 360′s HD DVD accessory don’t support. Ok, enough rambling now.

HDTV – which is better, 720p or 1080i? Not what you may think

HDTVLogoSmall

Nowadays, most consumers who buy new TVs are realizing it makes more sense to buy an HDTV rather than a SDTV (standard definition). Given the continuing drop of HDTV prices, it seems more and more likely that in the next one to two years, we could see the inevitable death of SDTV.

Most HDTVs support two resolutions that are considered to be “high-definition”, 720p and 1080i. Recently announced HDTVs are starting to support 1080p – but we’ll skip that for now to keep things simple.
The numbers preceding the letters are supposed to identify the number of lines that are displayed on the screen, so you would assume based on rudimentary math that 1080i is better than 720p – but this is where you would be partially wrong.

1080i (interlaced): In this mode, the HDTV displays half of the total lines (1080) or 540 lines per refresh. The best way to think about this is that for each frame of video the TV refreshes twice – once for the odd 540 lines and once for the even 540 lines. Since this happens so fast, to us mortals it looks like one image comprised of 1080 lines. Most HDTVs have a 60Hz refresh rate or can refresh themselves 60 times each second. Since with interlaced mode, the HDTV has to refresh at least twice per frame, the maximum frames/second it can display is 30.

  • 1080i is good for: Still images or scenes with little movement
  • 1080i is bad for: Fast moving images like watching Monday Night Football, playing a fast paced video game or watching action movies

720p (progressive): In this mode, the HDTV displays the whole frame (all 720 lines) at one time. Each frame in the video is refreshed on screen once, so doing the simple math, the HDTV is able to show 60 frames/second in this mode.

  • 720p is good for: Fast moving images like watching Monday Night Football, playing a fast paced video game or watching action movies
  • 720p is bad for: When viewing stills or scenes with little movement, the 720p will sacrifice some visual quality against watching the same thing at 1080i. The difference between the two is dependent on your particular HDTV – sometimes it is drastic and sometimes it is almost the same.

Summary: I recommend people try both and see what best suits you or perhaps even switch modes depending on what you’re viewing – but definitely give 720p a chance, in this case you can’t trust the numbers alone.

Here’s a great Link to a site with illustrations which explains how some consider 720p to be better than 1080i